Observation of Laryngeal Movements for
Throat Singing
Vibrations of two pairs of folds in the human larynx
Ken-Ichi Sakakibara, Tomoko Konishi, Emi Zuiki Murano,
Hiroshi Imagawa, Masanobu Kumada, Kazumasa Kondo, and Seiji Niimi
December 2002
In the world, there are
various styles of singing. These variations in voices are mainly associated
with variations in timbre. Such diversity of singing voices might have arisen
due to cultural diversity such as climate, geography, language, racial physical
feature, religion, musical structure, and so on. As a matter, we can find
considerable differences between European traditional or classical singing
voice, such as bel canto and German lied, and the Asian
traditional pressed singing voices, such as throat singing around the
Throat
singing is the traditional singing style of people who live around the
The production of the highly pitched overtone of throat singing is mainly due
to the pipe resonance of the cavity from the larynx to the point of
articulation in the vocal tract, which appear as the 2nd formant in its sound
spectrum. On the other hand, the laryngeal voice of throat singing has a
special pressed timbre and supports the generation of the overtone.
The laryngeal voices of throat singing can be classified into two voices: (i) squeezed
voice and (ii) kargyraa voice, based on the listener's impression,
acoustical characteristics, and the singer's personal observation on voice
production. The pressed voice is the basic laryngeal voice in throat singing
and used as drone. The equivalent voice is used in Japanese Naniwabsuhi. The
kargyraa voice is a very low pitched voice that ranges out of the modal
register. The kargyraa voice is very basic in Kai and perceptually identical to
Tibetan chant.
The ventricular folds or
false vocal folds (VTFs) are a pair of soft and flaccid folds which exist above
the vocal folds (Fig. 1). While the vocal folds (VFs) have a mechanism that
change the stiffness, thickness, and longitude by the muscles (mainly by the
action of thyroarytenoid muscle), the VTFs are incapable of becoming tense,
since they contain very few muscle fibres. It seems that the VTFs are capable
of moving with the arytenoid cartilages. They are also abducted and adducted by
the action of certain laryngeal muscles. The VTFs as well as the VFs act as air
traps from lungs and prevent foreign substances from entering the lower
respiratory tract. In normal phonation, the VTFs do not vibrate. But among some
patients with
dysphonia, the vibration of the VTFs is sometimes observed.

Fig. 2: High speed digital imaging system
Fig. 1: Coronal section of human larynx
We observed laryngeal
movements in throat singing directly and indirectly by simultaneous recording
of high-speed digital images, and EGG (Electroglottography) and sound waveforms
(Fig. 2). The high-speed digital images were captured at 4500 frames/s through
a flexible endoscope inserted into the nose cavity of a singer.
We obtained the following results from our observation. The common features of
the squeezed and kargyraa voices which are an overall constriction of the
supra-structures of the glottis and vibration of the VTFs. The difference lies
in the narrowness of the constriction and the manner of VTF vibration. In the
squeezed voice, the VTFs vibrate at the same frequency as the VFs and both
vibrate in the opposite phase (Fig. 3). In the kargyraa voice, the VTFs can be assumed
to close once for every two periods of closure of the VFs, and contribute to
the generation of the subharmonic tone of kargyraa (Fig. 4).
|
|
|
|
|
Fig. 3: High-speed images of the laryngeal movement for squeezed
voice |
|
|
|
Fig. 4: High-speed images of the laryngeal movement for kargyraa
voice |
Throat
singers are able to keep healthy, clear, and beautiful voices though they use
pressed-type voices which are regarded to be a non-preferable phonation in
European traditional musical pedagogy. They are able to use VTFs as well as VFs
and produce their preferable voices without hurting their phonatory organs.
Moreover, anyone can become skilled at producing these laryngeal voices.
Thus, the phonation of throat singing is natural and not mysterious.
We would like to thank
Kiyoshi Honda, Koichi Makigami, Caroline Menezes, Johan Sundberg, and Masahiko
Todoriki for their helpful discussions.
1. S.Adachi and M.Yamada, An acoustical study of sound
production in biphonic singing, Xöömij. J. Acoust. Soc. Am., 105,
pp.2920--2932, 1999.
2. T.C.Levin and M.E.Edgerton, The throat singers in
tuva. Scientific American , Sep-1999, pp.80--87, 1999.
3. L.Fuks, B.Hammarberg, and J.Sundberg, A self-sustained
vocal-ventricular phonation mode: acoustical, aerodynamic and glottographic
evidences. KTH TMH-QPSR, 3/1998, pp.49--59, 1998.
4. H.Imagawa, K.-I.Sakakibara, T.Konishi, and S.Niimi,
Throat singing synthesis by a laryngeal voice model based on vocal fold and
false vocal fold vibrations. Proc. of Study Group on Musical Info.,
01-MUS-39, pp. 71--78, Info. Processing Soc. Jpn., in Japanese, 2001.
5. P.-Å. Lindestat, M.Sodersten, B.Merker, and S.Granqvist,
Voice source characteristics in Mongolian "throat singing" studied
with high-speed imaging technique, acoutic spectra, and inverse filtering. J.
Voice, 15, pp. 78--85, 2001.
6. K.-I.Sakakibara, S.Adachi, T.Konishi, K.Kondo,
E.Z.Murano, M.Kumada, M.Todoriki, H.Imagawa, and S. Niimi, Analysis of vocal
fold vibrations in throat singing. Tech Rep. Musical Acoust. of Acoust. Soc.
Jpn., 19-4, pp. 41--48, in Japanese, 2000.
7. K.-I.Sakakibara, T.Konishi, K.Kondo, E.Z.Murano,
M.Kumada, H.Imagawa, and S.Niimi, Vocal fold and false vocal fold vibrations
and synthesis of khoomei. Proc. of ICMC, pp. 135-- 138, 2001.
8. K.-I.Sakakibara, H.Imagawa, S.Niimi, and N.Osaka,
Synthesis of the laryngeal source of throat singing using a 2x2-mass model. Proc.
of ICMC, pp. 5 -- 8, 2002.
Return to
Mongolian khoomii main page